Saturday, October 15, 2022

100 Side Hustles

 A few years ago, more years than I would like to admit, I had begun filming video lectures to help my students, and anyone else who would like to watch them, but then stopped. Then, a few years later, I purchased 100 Side Hustles by Chris Guillebeau, and while skimming through it I found several cases of individuals who, like me, had decided to film their tutorial videos for money.  

As I read these examples, I couldn't help but observe in my brain a film of me planning out my videos, my efforts to lift my huge glass board each weekend, whose backing I had painted myself in the cold while wearing a wet tattered cotton t-shirt because I just had to get it done and was too impatient to find my coat, whose dismantle-able stand I also made myself, which efforts I took with great eagerness and desire for the good that I could do. I could see the times that I had stood in front of the camera filming, only to abandon the project after filming video after video, take after take, mounting and takedown over a few weeks. I was, admittedly, deeply disappointed in myself for this act of abandonment. 

Subsequent to reading these cases, I felt a renewed vigor to film my tutorial videos once again and began to do so. Today I have created a collection of videos that I have successfully used to help many students, and I am not certain I would have taken up the filming once more when I did had it not been for my purchase and perusal of this book. 

If you are looking for a book filled with potential ideas for side hustling, or just ideas regarding making money, I definitely recommend this book. Even if most of the ideas in the book are not valuable to you, I am confident that at least one of the ideas will be something similar to something you could do, and hence it can serve as a kind of inspiration tool. 


Monday, August 29, 2022

Some Film Adaptations of The Most Dangerous Game for Comparison and Discussion

I am assembling this list of film adaptations of The Most Dangerous Game for all those of you out there who would like to supplement the subtle joy of reading Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game with cinematic adaptations. 


 The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

You can actually watch this superb adaptation here:



I have previously remarked on my perspective regarding the differences between this film and the short story narrative. 

For a small fee, you can actually watch this film in a version which has had color applied to it. You can find it , for example, on YouTube. 


Surviving the Game (1994)

This can be found on YouTube as well as on DVD



Surviving the Game takes the central story of the hunt of a man as the ultimate hunting experience and builds it out in a manner that dispenses with the need for an abandoned island, dispenses with the need for the random boat to scuttle itself on the rocky crags of the inhospitable and shark infested waters of Ship Trap Island, and substitutes a type of recruitment outfit, to permit the active and regular acquisitions of suitable quarries. 

Surviving the Game, like the 1932 adaptation, takes some liberties with the story, there are complicated interpersonal conflicts that arise which are original to the film, but which add substantively to the drama of Surviving the Game. In discussing the psychology of the individuals involved, there are some differences from those present in the short story. 

In any case, Surviving the Game is a movie that I love, it is a great movie to watch on its own, and it is a great movie to watch to compare and contrast with The Most Dangerous game

The Hunt (2020)



In this film which further builds on the human hunt theme brought to such high form in The Most Dangerous Game, we again see a mechanism developed to effectively kidnap people for the purpose of being used as hunting quarries, we see a slight shakeup in that the analogue of the Zaroff character is a woman(played by the great Hilary Swank) and the analogue of the Rainsford character is also a woman(played by Betty Gilpin), and we again see slight variations in the psychology of the main characters. 

I definitely recommend this film as a companion for the short story. 

The Most Dangerous Game (2020)

This is a taught, thrilling, dialogue-rich, adrenaline-inducing, edge-of-your-seat experience. Its cinematography is superb and awe inspiring. Finally, the performances given by Liam Hemsworth and Christoph Waltz were absolutely first-rate. (As of right now - August 2022 - you can watch it free at Roku Online at https://therokuchannel.roku.com/details/49922e8caf9059048bd2024461789b92/most-dangerous-game)



Though each of the films in this list deviate to some extent from the short story, there is a twist in this story that makes it - in my opinion - far far darker. Having said that, I do have to confess that this adaptation captured the seriousness of the original adaptation or the short story and is a superb movie. I recommend this film hands down.

Hunting Ava Bravo (2022)

This is another variation of a human intentionally hunting another human in a remote location for the thrills of it. It kept me on the edge of my seat. It stars Kate del Castillo, a famous mexican actress, as the prey and Marc Blucas as the hunter. It serves as yet another great movie to watch to compare and contrast with The Most Dangerous Game. The trailer can be seen below:




At the current moment you can watch Hunting Ava Bravo here for free (https://therokuchannel.roku.com/details/ddc07fe0d6f395b126b99c2babd59282/hunting-ava-bravo)

The Most Dangerous Game (2022)




In this film adaptation starring Casper van Dien as the Zaroff character and Christopher Tamburello as the Rainsford character, we have an adaptation that follows the story relatively well. Though some critics have said that the film was cheesy or weak or some other such claim, I feel that it was still satisfactory. Van Dien plays a Zaroff that is totally sinister, totally wild, and while slightly caricaturish  relatively satisfying. If you are going to watch films related to The Most Dangerous Game, I recommend that you watch this modern interpretation at least once. 

AV: The Hunt (2020)



Though this film cannot possibly be stated to be an adaptation of The Most Dangerous Game, I felt that it was sufficiently similar in a large aspect of the plot to include in this list. The problem that launches the Hunt is entirely entirely foreign to the plot of the short story, but the actual hunt itself captures the same fascination as the short story, is dramatic, thrilling, and definitely thought provoking and in my opinion a good pairing with the short story as with the rest of the films in this list. 

Desierto (2015)


I felt that this film could not avoid being added to this list. 

This is a tight thriller directed by Jonas Cuaron. It keeps you on the edge of your seat the whole way through. It definitely belongs on this list as a worthy film to watch when considering The Most Dangerous Game.


Conclusion

I am confident that there are a great many other films that involve people hunting people, I believe this is a good start for anyone seeking films to supplement The Most Dangerous Game. I believe that the 1932 film and the 2022 eponymous films follow the short story most closely. The rest of the films are included here for comparison, contrast, and discussion, more generally, regarding the short story. 

I believe that the great 1997 movie The Game which stars Michael Douglas and the 2014 movie Beyond the Reach are also highly worthy of consideration when considering this theme. 

Moreover, it must be stated that this post is focused on The Most Dangerous Game, the great short story, and for this reason I did not touch or approach discussion of two serial killers who had a modus operandi of attempting to, aspiring to, or yearning to be "hunters" of men. The serial killer Thomas Dillon would use a rifle to shoot men at a distance, and he would then just simply leave the body and flee the scene, this made it difficult for him to be tracked and apprehended. There was a Twisted Killers episode and an FBI Files episode dedicated to this killer. Robert Hansen was more methodical in his approach and actually did hunt his victims in the Alaskan wilderness. There is an FBI Files episode, a First Blood episode, and a film The Frozen Ground based on his story. I find both of these detestable figures awful in the extreme, but I felt that it was necessary to include this brief discussion to emphasize that my avoidance of this topic was intentional. 

I hope that this list helps any of you to examine this topic thouroughly. 

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Idaho Falls - What? - Where? - A forgotten and little known nuclear accident

I just read Idaho Falls by William McKeown

Let me first say that I finished it within hours of starting it, all told it probably took me all of five hours to read it. It was a genuine page turner with a strong narrative, a careful discussion of the victims of the Idaho Falls incident, a discussion of their entry into the nuclear program, their arrival and personal characteristics regarding their activities and temperament at SL 1, material providing color on their likely psychological state in the moments leading up to the accident, and a careful discussion of the fallout which came afterwards. 

For me there were several themes that stood out in this book. One theme that stood out is inter-agency and extra-agency rivalries, another theme is the willingness to overlook the human element, to think that technical excellence alone is enough to avoid tragedy, another theme is the capacity for people to get used to things, to begin to think that things that are extraordinary and special and above all dangerous are in fact normal and mundane, and finally the willingness to permit problems to fester when they need to be fixed. 

Similarly stupefying was the manner in which the SL 1 tragedy previsaged, albeit on a small scale, the same events that would later happen at Chernobyl. Both crews were going in to do some kind of maintenance. Both crews were unaware of what might happen if they violated the rules. Both reactors had design flaws which made the eventual failure more likely.  In the case of the SL 1 reactor, as usual, the likelihood of a possible criticality was kept secret from the operators. In the case of the Chernobyl reactor, there were various design flaws which were kept secret from the operators. In the case of the SL 1 reactor, it is likely that the operators had no idea that things went wrong, or if they had any idea, it was likely a bright blue flash for a brief fraction of a second. The main incident itself, the subject of this whole book, the first nuclear accident with fatalities, occurred in fact, literally in less than a second, between 9:00 and 9:01 pm. In a similar way, the Chernobyl reactor exploded abruptly once the situation got out of hand. In the cleanup operation at SL 1, they assembled about a thousand individuals who would each spend a minute or two on the premises to perform the cleanup of the SL 1 site. This is very similar, except on a much tinier scale, as what would eventually happen in Chernobyl. 

The manner in which McKeown pieces together the post-accident analysis was very smooth and informative. Like a detective story, he weaves together the various kinds of information and evidence available to the investigators and lays out concretely the facts of what happened and how these facts were derived. It was fascinating and enthralling. 

What is most troubling is the fact that this accident is so little known, that the lessons it provided were not entirely heeded, and above all, that we still believe that nuclear power is safe, that we think we can control it, and that we will not ever ever ever have another accident, and that if we do, it will be able to be contained. 

I see Idaho Falls as a further cautionary tale about the dangers of Nuclear Energy. I definitely recommend this book!! 


Sunday, August 21, 2022

Animal Farm and its Blueprint for Totalitarian States

(There will be spoilers to Animal Farm and The Handmaid's Tale in the following writeup, if you do not like spoilers, please read Animal Farm first. You have been warned.)




Inception of this Work


After recently reading the Handmaid's Tale and later watching the Handmaid's Tale Hulu Series, I wanted to revisit my reading of some totalitarian literature to reflect effectively on different totalitarian models that have existed in works of literature, and I decided to begin by reading Animal Farm by George Orwell again. Of course I had read Animal Farm many years ago as a child, but reading Animal Farm again let me see it as the template of a totalitarian system that it always was. 

There seems to be several factors to a functioning totalitarian system. Some mythos for why the government is structured as it is, some underlying rationale or justification for its existence, some means of distracting the populace from their suffering, to include positive propaganda about the state, negative propaganda about other states, an active effort to rewrite history in whatever means seems appropriate to help the state dominate the people, an active attempt to subject the populace to excessive work and bare minimum nourishment to inhibit the ability for them to reason rationally or have sufficient energy to pose any resistance, eventually some form of overt terror or violence that can be used to threaten the populace, and an active threat that what one says can be overheard and create doubts about one's loyalty to the state. Also central to the functioning of a totalitarian state is the perception that the values that are positive within the state are "loyalty and obedience" [Orwell, page 70] as opposed to say "freedom" or "bravery". 

Certainly, in the case of Animal Farm there was an act of rebellion that brought on the beginning of the totalitarian state that represents the bulk of Animal Farm. In the Handmaid's Tale, the Republic of Gilead is brought about after a coup, just like in Animal Farm. In various other totalitarian states, there have been dramatic seizures of power as of course the Soviet Union, upon which Animal Farm was itself based, as well as Nazi Germany, Pinochet's Chile, among others. I make this observation to stress that a violent takeover, a coup, is NOT necessary for the institution of a totalitarian state. It is simply necessary that there are sufficient people in power, to either little by little, or all of a sudden, make the changes necessary to render the people helpless to the control of the state. In the case of Animal Farm, a coup was needed to move the drama along.

Mythos or Rationale

          In Animal Farm, the main rationale behind the rebellion is first articulated by Old Major, a senior pig who has lived a full life and decides to share what he has learned over the course of his life. In Old Major's eloquent speech, he says:

Let us face it: our lives are miserable, laborious, and short. We are born, we are given just so much food as will keep the breath in our bodies, and those of us who are capable of it are forced to work to the last atom of our strength; and the very instance that our usefulness has come to an end we are slaughtered with hideous cruelty. [Orwell, page 28]  

He then continues to lay out what he sees as the root cause of their misery: "Because nearly the whole of the produce of our labor is stolen from us by human beings." [Orwell, page28]. It is here that Old Major notes an injustice that is unfortunately familiar to many: being paid far far less than one is worth. Early on in the Animal Farm period a description is given of the bliss the animals are experiencing. The narrator states, 

All through that summer, the work of the farm went like clockwork. The animals were happy as they had never conceived it possible to be. Every mouthful of food was an acute positive pleasure, now that it was truly their own food, produced by themselves and for themselves, not doled out to them by a grudging master. With the worthless parasitical human beings gone, there was more for everyone to eat. There was more leisure too, inexperienced though the animals were. [Orwell, page 46]

Here we see a growing sense among the animals  that the Utopia that Old Major stated was needed had in fact occurred. The animals were getting a genuine sense that their quality of lives had improved, that they are not in a state of abject poverty, that they are not suffering from chronic hunger, and that they were in fact thriving. 

     Later, as Snowball makes the case for the construction of the windmill, one can see in his argument for the windmill his legitimate concern for the wellbeing of his fellow animals, and one can see how Snowball's values and arguments match the increased labor that will be required with the potential benefits to the Animals. Snowball claimed that after a year of difficult labor, upon the completion of the windmill, ". . . so much labor would be saved that the animals would only need to work three days a week." [Orwell, page 65] Napoleon then shoots down Snowball's assertions, claiming that the construction of the windmill would cause the animals to starve due to the diversion of their labor from the cultivation of crops. To these statements Snowball countered passionately and eloquently: 

In glowing sentences he painted a picture of Animal Farm as it might be when sordid labor was lifted from the animals' backs. His imagination had now run far beyond chaff cutters and turnip slicers. Electricity, he said, could operate threshing machines, ploughs, harrows, rollers, and reapers, and binders, besides supplying every stall with its own electric light, hot and cold water, and an electric heater. [Orwell, page 67]

Snowball's case is absolutely centered on reducing the labor of the animals and increasing their quality of life. Of course, it is at this moment that Snowball is run out of Animal Farm by Napoleon's dogs. From this point forward, the Utopic nature of Animal Farm descends into a dystopic nightmare, a nightmare worse than it had been under Jones. 

     The underlying mythos or rationale for Animal Farm is that it provides greater dignity for it's inhabitants than they had previously known, greater well-being, greater food, more leisure, and less exploitation. This is central to the functioning of the totalitarian system because it provides a reason for existing, a story for why the country needs to be the way it is. In a certain sense, all governments need a underlying myth or story to make the governed have some faith in their government, to have some pride in their government, and to help to discourage rebellion and chaos against the government.

     The need for these myths become more clear as animals begin to in some cases express and in other cases simply sense their perilous situation.  


Propaganda


In order to control a population, which of course is the goal of a totalitarian society, there are three main approaches: you can control people by controlling what they believe, you can control people by force, or you can control people via a blend of these approaches. Moreover, the degree to which a country tries to oppress its people is directly related to the type of control mechanisms required. For example, in an ideal society, there would still need propaganda to remind people of the beneficence of their society, the values they hold dear, and the benefits of remaining organized in the manner that they are. For other societies, societies that utterly deprive people of their autonomy and agency, there is a need for force and violence, and such a society would have little need for propaganda, at least not to those who are being deprived of their autonomy and agency. As most types of governing structures lie somewhere between these two extremes, there is a need  for propaganda to encourage people to have faith in their form of government, to understand why some sacrifices were being asked of them, and to continue their allegiance to their system of government. 


Animal Farm takes us through five phases of governmental control. The first phase is that which is led by Mr. Jones, in which the animals are subject to absolute control through fear and panic. The second is the immediate post-rebellion phase in which each animal feels that they will inhabit the utopia predicted by Old Major, where animals will live free and live without exploitation. The third phase is when the stated values begin to be distorted as the Pigs seize power little by little.  The fourth phase is that where the democracy of the animals is essentially suppressed. The fifth phase is a return to the Mr. Jones style dystopic control of the animals, except with the pigs running the show.

During the period when Jones is in control, there is no need for propaganda, at least presented by the humans, represented by Mr. Jones, to the animals, for any act they do against that desired by the humans will be punished severely. Sadly and shamefully, there have been periods when some groups of humans have been put to such a state of slavery, and where these very same implements of control have been utilized against humans. The infamous period of Slavery in the United States as well as the period of slavery during the reign of Shi Huang Di are good examples. During Shi Huang Di's reign, for example, they had these special neck rings with a spike, the purpose of which was to prevent those wearing it from standing with their back straight, it was a means of exerting absolute brutal control over other human beings. There were similar implements used during the period of slavery in the United States, chains, collars, and the threat of horrific whippings. During periods such as this, there is no reason for propaganda. The message that is sent by the enslavers to the enslaved is that there are two alternatives, "this abject brutal subjugation where you have no choice or agency over your life, where you cannot even stand up properly" or you are physically hurt severely or are killed. 

During the second phase, in the immediate post-rebellion period, propaganda is used internally by the government structure to lay out the rationale behind the rebellion, the shared values or basis for the rebellion, and the beliefs that the emancipated animals share that justify this new situation.  In this phase, propaganda is also used externally to justify the rebellion to foreign actors. Real life examples of both of these types of propaganda can be found for example in the Declaration of Independence of the United States. Consider the following passage: 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. 

The internal type of propaganda I described earlier, which here also can be seen to simultaneously serve external purposes, can be found in the first lines of this passage, where the "unalienable Rights" are laid out, that each person has a right to "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", and that "all men are created equal." In this portion the document lists the foundational values of the soon to be birthed nation, it is an aspirational statement. The external type of propaganda can also be found here in the lines justifying the overthrow of the existing government.

In the context of Animal Farm, this type of internal propaganda can be seen in the Beasts of England Song. A reading of the song reveals the desire to throw off the shackles imposed on them by humans and a desire to possess all of nature independent of humans. The Beasts of England is a kind of aspirational articulation of the desires Old Major expressed for his fellow animals in his speech to them. At the same time, the use of propaganda for external purposes was also in effect as can be demonstrated in the following passage: 

Every day Snowball and Napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on neighboring farms, tell them the story of the Rebellion, and teach them the tune of Beasts of England. [Orwell, page 54]

For the Animals on Animal Farm, the singing of the Beasts of England is a way of reminding themselves of the rationale for the rebellion and an affirmation that there is a justification for their new way of life. It is a way of letting them know that they can be proud of their new system of government and the values it represents. Moreover, at this moment, early on in the post Rebellion period, the animals can see the benefits promised by Old Major that would occur when the humans were overthrown. For the external receivers of the propaganda Napoleon and Snowball are sending via pigeon to other farms, there is a goal of providing animals in a state of slavery hope and a vision for what is possible, and by so doing encouraging other rebellions on other farms. 

The third phase is the most tenuous for the government's legitimacy and stability. It is at this moment when propaganda is beginning to be blended with force, or the threat of force, often includes gaslighting, has increasing realization among the governed that things are not consistent with the foundational values, or at least stated foundational values of the government, and the government too has become aware of lapses in belief among the governed. In real life, we can see this kind of propaganda in the United States(circa 2022 should you stumble upon this later in the future), when news outlets state that the economy is great while many of the biggest and most profitable companies in the world lay off workers en-masse and are considering further layoffs. It is what Orwell was to later describe as "doublespeak" and "newspeak".  

This third phase begins quite abruptly when Napoleon settles an Argument with Snowball by force. In a passionate argument for the construction of the windmill, Snowball argues that the short term sacrifice of their labor for the construction of the windmill will yield actual tangible quality of life benefits to all the animals; that is, he was pleading with them in a manner consistent with the goals espoused by Old Major's original statements to the animals as with their distillation in the Beasts of England. To put it differently, Snowball represents Animalism, Snowball represents the goals that the Rebellion was predicated on, he represents the aspirations that Old Major had for the animals in a post Human, or at least Post Mr-Jones world. His sudden ouster with the dogs which had been raised by Napoleon in secret eliminates the democratic aspects of the society, the debates and the tacit consent of the governed, and replaces it with an autocracy headed by Napoleon. Napoleon stated: 

He announced that from now on the Sunday-morning Meetngs would come to an end. They were unnecessary, he said, and wasted time. In future all questions related to the working of the farm would besettled by a special committee of pigs, presided over by himself. These would meet in private and afterwards communicate their decisions to the others. The animals would still assemble on Sunday mornings to salute the flag, sing Beasts of England, and receive their orders for the week; but there would be no more debates. [Orwell page 68]

The first sentence makes clear the transformation to a Napoleon led society, but it is interesting to note that though debates have been eliminated, that while aspects of democracy have been axed, the pageantry is maintained. By having the animals salute the flag and sing Beasts of England every Sunday, it is hoped that the animals will be sufficiently confused that they will still believe that the government will be seeking goals aligned with their best interest and hence acquiese to these new changes. It is at this moment that that Napoleon, through Squealer, attempts to reassure the animals of Animal Farm that he is going to look out for their best interests: 

I trust that every animal here appreciates the sacrifice that Comrade Napoleon has made in thaking this extra labour upon himself. Do not imagine, Comrades, that leadership is a pleasure! On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility. No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be? [Orwell, page 69]

But should the animals not realize that they have no longer any control, Squealer notes that the new values to be aspired to are "loyalty and obedience" [Orwell page 70] and moreover that, "One false step, and our enemies would be upon us. Surely comrades, you do not want Jones back?" [Orwell, page 70] Here we see the gaslighting that the propaganda at this third stage includes, it is a way that the government tries to let their citizens know that their plight could be worse if they disobey or rebel. 

Of course it is during this period that the pigs are little by little seizing greater and greater control over the other animals, applying further and further mechanisms of control, of which hunger and exhaustion are two, until they finally reveal their absolute control and reveal the use of terror. It is during this period that a society can fall victim to greater domination by the governing structure or can attempt a redirection through political or extra-political means.  

We can see the transformation of the governing structure occur little by little as each of the Seven Commandments are systematically violated by the pigs. Each of these violations is then explained to the other animals as necessary, for their benefit, not actually a violation, as the law is seen to be re-written, we later find out by Squealer, and is finally justified with the gaslighting threat of a possible return of Mr. Jones if the pigs are resisted. 

This transformation is aided by a systematic maintenance of hunger and exhaustion in the animals. The initial introduction of this technique can be found the moment Napoleon decides that the Windmill will be built, "He did not give any reason for having changed his mind, but merely warned the animals that this extra task would mean very hard work; it might even be necessary to reduce their rations." [Orwell, page 71] During this period propaganda is used to attempt to convince the animals that the situation is not deteriorating for them. One such instance occurs when each Sunday Squealer reports food production: "On Sunday mornings Squealer, holding down a long strip of paper with his trotter, would read out to them lists of figures proving that the production of every class of foodstuff had increased by two hundred per cent, three hundred per cent, or five hundred per cent, as the case might be." [Orwell, page 99] Furthermore, during a previous episode of difficult labor, the speeches that Squealer would give lend insight into the propagandistic attempt via doublespeak, though Orwell had not yet coined this term, to try to keep the animals spirits up, by trying to make the animals believe that labor is a good thing. Squealer's speeches focused on the "joy of service and the dignity of labor." [Orwell, page 84-5] It is difficult to see how this is different from the cynical use of Arbeit Macht Frei at the gates of Nazi concentration camps. We later find out that the hunger and exhaustion had been totally intentional all along, "He believed that he was right in saying that the lower animals on Animal Farm did more work and received less food than any animals in the county." [Orwell, page 135-6]


It is during this third phase that the animals have the greatest doubt and grow in their concern that things are not what they should be. In one moment we have Boxer expressing his shock at the new situation: 

I do not understand it. I would not have believed that such things could happen on our farm. It must be due to some fault in ourselves. The solution as I see it is to work harder. [Orwell, page 94] 

In this act of reflection we see a stunned Boxer, an individual who is trying to rationalize what is happening, an individual who is having difficulty comprehending what is happening for what it is. It is similar to like a Stockholm syndrome. As a side note, Boxer states a phrase that has, unfortunately, echoed through time: "I would not have believed that such things could happen on our farm." Recent situations in the world have brought about such absurdities and atrocities that variations on this phrase have appeared in the media related to many topics including the election of Trump, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the assault on the capitol on 6 January 2021, and various other horrific and terrible things. It is a lesson to never doubt what can happen when enough people sit on the sidelines and wonder whether what their eyes see is the truth or a mirage, it might sadly be a horrible truth. Clover, likewise, has deep reservations about the situation in Animal Farm at this moment and the narrator expresses the poignant and moving thoughts that Clover would have experienced, had she been capable of articulating her thoughts, 

If she herself had had any picture of the future, it had been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of Major's speech. [Orwell, page 95] 

It is a reinforcement of the fact that the animals were aware of the meaning of Major's speech, the ideal of fairness that Major communicated, and their panic as they realize that the situation is not as it should be.

It must not be omitted that the construction of the windmill and the propaganda spoken about Plinkington and Frederick are meant to serve as distracting goals for the animals. The pigs want to focus the animal's attentions on Plinkington and Frederick, in order that they focus less on their own suffering, their own hunger, their own exhaustion, and develop fear and panic at the thought that Animal Farm could be overtaken by either of these farmers. The pigs want the animals to focus on the goal of completing the windmill, and what the windmill will provide, the ease to them that will be gained upon the windmill's completion, at least the perceived ease that they will gain on its completion, for by doing so they will focus less on their suffering and hunger. This is another aspect of the control mechanism utilized in Animal Farm. 

We then arrive at the fourth stage of the governance at Animal Farm. The pigs declare to the other animals that the singing of the Beasts of England is no longer permitted[Orwell, page 96]. The banning of the Singing of the Beasts of England is analogous to the banning of books in other autocratic societies, or forbidding individuals from learning to read and write. Moreover, the forbidding of songs like Beasts of England is designed to obliterate hope. To put it differently, the singing of patriotic songs, or the reading of literature that inspires the human spirit, perhaps reading the work of others who have shaken off their shackles, perhaps hearing stories of successful rebellion, or a goal worth pursuing is repeatedly responsible for  the improvement of the human condition. It is for this reason that "slave owning states did all they could to suppress news of the rebellion" [Britannica, 2020] when Haitian slaves rebelled and were able to cause the French to relinquish control of Haiti, leaving the formerly enslaved to run their country. 

Over time this state of being hardens into total domination. This then is the fifth stage of governance at Animal Farm. At this point the pigs have become indistinguishable from the humans, and the animals are in a more abject dominated state than they ever had been. Moreover, at this point, the possibility of rebellion has been effectively eliminated. The animals are overworked and underfed, their morale is destroyed, they realize that the situation is dire, and there is no one who can lead them all as a group to attempt anything resembling the previous rebellion. It is an ending without hope. 


Three Important Character Arcs


Though Orwell develops each of his characters to a startling extent considering his concision in this work, there are three that particularly stand out to me as important in the context of the current discussion. Boxer represents a true believer, Snowball represents a faithful leader who is fully committed to the utopic vision laid out by Old Major, and Clover is the sharp witted citizen who observes things as they are. 

Snowball's character arc begins with him being a member of Animal Farm, like all the other animals. He becomes instrumental to the formulation of Animalism, and carefully designs the windmill as a means of helping to achieve the goal of a higher quality of life for the animals. Snowball is critical in the successful outcome of the rebellion, and wins a medal for his participation. When Napoleon finds Snowball's argumentative prowess superior to his own, and hence feels his dominance threatened, he utilizes force to eliminate his rival from Animal Farm. As of this moment Snowball was entirely on board with the principles laid out by Old Major. 

Post expulsion, Snowball is summoned by Napoleon and his minions as a suitable scapegoat for harmful things that are occurring on the farm. Moreover, his official history morphs from being a celebrated hero of the Battle of the Cowshed to a double agent for Jones and traitor from the start. It demonstrates how totalitarian societies can re-write history in such a way that individuals are villified post expulsion and even post death. 

Boxer, on the other hand, is a true believer. He lives originally by one Motto, "I will work harder," and later adds the motto "Napoleon is always right." Boxer's use of the motto "I will work harder" was predicated on a belief that by working harder, he would contribute best to the wellbeing of all the animals. After an interchange that involves Squealer's threat that if Napoleon's commands were not followed Mr. Jones might return, Boxer exclaims that "Napoleon is always right." In that sense, Boxer was trying to continue acting in the best interests of the Animals. 

Boxer, of course, is known for his incredible strength, his tremendous work ethic, and his pivotal role in the Battle of the Cowshed. He is crucial for the completion of the Windmill the two times that it is achieved. He is a natural leader who leads by example, and even though he might not be the most intelligent of the animals, he is genuine in his desire to help the animals. 

But upon Boxer's injury he is sent to the glue factory, just as Old Major had described the the fate of all farm animal, ". . . the very instance that our usefulness has come to an end we are slaughtered with hideous cruelty." [Orwell, page 28] It is symbolic of the return of the iron tyranny to Animal Farm. But what is also significant about the Boxer storyline is the vicious and brutal lies that Squealer spreads about the manner in which Boxer was looked after by a veterinarian. This shows the manner in which totalitarian societies propagandize people's lives cynically. It demonstrates that in a society like this, the animals - people - can be exploited even in death. 

With respect to Clover, we see a smart thoughtful animal, carefully reflecting on each violation of the Animal Farm Commandments, comparing the actions of the pigs to the written letter of the Commandments, each time discovering that they have been slightly changed. She represents those individuals who realize that the society is not living up to the values originally espoused in its founding. 

Conclusion

What stood out for me about Animal Farm is that it is almost as if someone had decided to put together a how-to manual to running a totalitarian society, wrapped it in a heartfelt memorable story, wrote it in as few words as possible, and then achieved it miraculously. At the same time, and possibly for this very reason, it was chilling and terrifying, and the similarity of some news stories to the goings on in the modern world brought me some pause. 

But what a great book!!

References 

     Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Haitian Revolution". Encyclopedia Britannica, 9 Mar. 2020, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Haitian-Revolution. Accessed 21 August 2022.


Orwell, George. Animal Farm (Signet Classics). United Kingdom, Signet Classics, 1999.

Friday, August 12, 2022

Double O . . . . Pigeon? What???

 

You may have seen a pigeon today, perhaps you have seen many pigeons today, perhaps thousands. But perhaps instead it has been you who has been under constant surveillance. Perhaps each pigeon you have spotted today has reported on your every action, your comings and goings, your meetings and all those who you have interacted with. Perhaps you thought that your dead drop was slick and unobserved? Wrong! Perhaps you thought you were able to switch out of enough cars and engage in enough twists and turns in the city to alleviate yourself of all the tails you were trying to  avoid. Wrong!! All observed and reported. 

     Though the lead in above is tongue-in-cheek, I recently read a book which absolutely fascinated me with the way that pigeons were actually used in World War Two, and how the intelligence they gathered could have significantly changed the course of the war, potentially saving many many lives. In Gordon Corera's Operation Columba: The Secret Pigeon Service, Corera describes in explicit detail the way that the British ran a pigeon intelligence operation that was not only extremely serious, that not only demonstrated its value in a communication that was received via pigeon, but that sadly was halted from realizing its full potential due to internal strife and politicks within the British war effort. 
     In the initial parts of this book, Corera lays out the reality of war at a time before modern communication equipment, even radio was at that time very primitive. From a military perspective, though radio would permit nearly instant communication over long distances, it would not provide the secrecy needed to gain a tactical advantage via the communication of up to the minute information. But as he points out, Pigeons like to return to where they grow up. That is, if you have a pigeon that is being grown in a particular cubbyhole at Person 1352's house, and you then release that pigeon from some distance away, then that pigeon will instinctively fly toward its cubbyhole at Person 1352's house. Upon reading this reality, it made immediate sense to me why this was desirable. If some pigeon could be made to carry sensitive tactically advantageous material from behind enemy lines, even from deep within enemy territory, it could more than likely be expected to fly to its cubbyhole within a few hours, sufficiently fast at that time to permit the exploitation of a strategic advantage. 
     From this purely technical aspect and the manner in which the British outfitted and sourced these pigeons, it became clear how they were used for the war effort. Reading these technical details opened my eyes to an aspect of intelligence work to which I had up until that moment remained utterly ignorant. Never before had I ever wondered why some pigeons were referred to as "homing pigeons", never before had I ever looked at a pigeon and thought intelligence asset, never before had I considered them as a military animal. I felt utterly green, a total beginner. 
     At the same time, it was entirely clear to me why such a technique would have remained unknown to me. For one thing, this particular program - "Operation Columba" - was utterly secret and the documents surrounding this program were hidden in British Archives until Mr. Corera read them and compiled them into his book. For another thing, such techniques are really no longer needed, as secret means of communication in real time are much more available to intelligence agents. Moreover, such techniques as the use of a pigeon to transmit information seems to be something that is unlikely to emerge in popular culture, as it seems so mundane and boring to include, even though most spycraft is actually mundane and boring. For example, imagine pitching a film producer on the idea of a scene where the spy hero is going to attach a message to a bird which will return to the spy's handlers. It seems to me that such a pitch would end up with the producer laughing, the pitcher being escorted out, or if listened to, being discouraged from including such a detail in the film. As opposed to a heated chase scene or something of this nature, the mundane ordinary reality of statecraft is something that is less sexy than one might think, and is less convincing to producers as something that will look good on film. I have to confess just briefly that I am well aware that there are great producers and directors out there who would have used such minutia in their films, and have seen such great films before, but these are of course the unfortunate exception. It is easier to sell a shoot-it-up production, which I of course - I must admit with great shame - also enjoy. One such great film is the legendary The Day of the Jackal, which I recommend without any hesitation or reservation whatever.  As a final reason I would be unlikely to have previously become aware of this technique is the simple fact that as time passes, the different techniques that previous humans used for different tasks begin to be lost to history. Writers who grow up in a world absent of these old techniques have less chance of being exposed to these techniques, and hence less chance to write about such techniques, and little by little the transmission of such techniques begins to diminish to a trickle, later to drips, and finally silence.  
     But it is the very human drama that Mr. Corera brings up surrounding the internal politics of the pigeon operation, the posturing and battle behind the scenes in the British Ministry of Defense, the different personalities and their squabbles for power, and the very real impact that their bickering had on the war that makes reading Mr. Corera's book worth it. It is a sobering tale of what-if that crushes with its tantalizing possibility of the opportunities lost to petty internal bickering. 

Some literary use of birds to gather Intelligence

From the Bible:

Probably one of the earliest written records of humans relying on birds to gather intelligence is the famous scene in Genesis where Noah releases a raven and later a dove to determine whether the great flood had yet subsided. 

And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made. And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth. Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground. But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark. [Genesis 8 6-12] 

In light of the use of birds for intelligence gathering in World War II, this story takes  on new meaning. 

From Animal Farm:




In Animal Farm there were several episodes where pigeons are engaged in intelligence gathering and dissemination. Granted that the means by which the intelligence was shared from the pigeons to the pigs and vice versa was largely different from the manner that intelligence gathering was done in real life use of spy pigeons, it was still the use of spy pigeons. Furthermore, prior to my reading of Operation Columba, I read these passages as a natural consequence of the personification of the pigeons and the animal's ability to communicate with one another via speech. 

There were several different places where pigeons are used for the purposes of intelligence activities. The first is almost immediately after the ouster of Mr. Jones and the success of the rebellion of the animals in Animal Farm. Its purpose is to try to foment rebellions in other farms by other animals. One example can be found in, "Every day Snowball and Napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on neighboring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of the Beasts of England."[pg 54] 

The success of these efforts can be found in a later passage 

"Bulls which had always been tractable suddenly turned savage, sheep broke down the hedges and devoured the clover, cows kicked the pail over, hunters refused their fences and shot their riders on to the other side. Above all, the tune and even the words to the Beasts of England were known everywhere."[page 56]

This can be likened to the leafleting that was done originally with balloons and later with planes behind enemy lines to convince the population of a military enemy either to betray their leaders and defect, provide information, or even rise up in rebellion themselves. 

Another intelligence scenario can be found in Chapter 4 paragraph 6 in which Mr. Jones's approach to retake Animal Farm is communicated to the Animals at Animal Farm.  ". . . a flight of pigeons came whirling through the air alighted in the yard of Animal Farm in the wildest excitement. Jones and all his men, with half a dozen others . . . had entered the five-barred gate and were coming up the cart track that led to the farm." [Orwell, page 56]

This is of course the type of information that was most sought by the British War Ministry in Operation Columba. More generally, this is one of the most basic types of intelligence that is sought by intelligence agencies, the information that can prevent one from being attacked under the condition of surprise. 

In a different moment, Mollie had disappeared from the farm, perhaps we might want to say defected, and the pigs wanted to know what had happened. Later they were to receive their answer: "Three days later Mollie disappeared. For some weeks nothing was known of her whereabouts, then the pigeons reported that they had seen her on the other side of Willingdon." [pg 62] Here we see basic information being gathered via pigeon. 

In one final moment of the use of pigeons in Animal Farm, we see the pigeons returning to Animal Farm with intelligence written on a scrap of paper which has been attached to the pigeon. "But at this moment the four pigeons, who had been sent out on the day before, returned, one of them bearing a scrap of paper from Plinkington. On it was penciled the words: "Serves you right."" [ page 107] This was the closest that Animal Farm's use of pigeons as intelligence agents comes to the real way pigeons were used in war. In WWII, a small special plastic tube was attached to the legs of the pigeons to permit the placement of intelligence for transport to England. 

Some Everyday Phrases which seemed related to the content above


Reading Operation Columba gave the idioms "a little birdie told me" and "sing/sang like a bird" new meaning. The first  of course means that someone has told you about something to the surprise of others who think you remain in ignorance of some novel fact. The second is less close to the content of this work, but references a bird as something that talks about secret information. 

References 

Orwell, George. Animal Farm (Signet Classics). United Kingdom, Signet Classics, 1999.

Sunday, April 17, 2022

How I try to help girls perform better in mathematics

One of my biggest pet peeves is when I have a female client who states some variation of “I suck at math” or “Math is not my strong suit”.  

The reason that this bothers me is the impediment it serves to the student’s ability to progress, in and of itself, regardless of whether they had come to see me for tutoring or not. In other words, for reasons that I will lay out shortly, this statement means that the student will have a lower chance of success regardless of what I do as a tutor, or regardless of what their teacher or other tutor does, unless and until I – or someone else – forces them to stop reinforcing this corrosive and self destructive thought. Therefore, for my own clients who are girls who state some variation of “I suck at math”, I begin by telling them to delete this thought from their brain and to refrain from re-inforcing this thought by stating this thought out loud.

The first argument that I provide my clients is that by stating that they either do not have skill or talent in math, they will have less belief in their ability to improve, and this belief will corrode at their willingness to persist in their study, and hence will reduce their ability to improve; a downward spiral that ultimately inhibits the student’s ability to improve. Thus, by trying to convince the student to believe that their skill in mathematics is not inferior to anyone else’s, I hope to put the student on a path that will help them put effort into their mathematical studies.

The second argument that I provide to my students is that their statements that “I suck at math” serve as a sub-conscious permission to or protection mechanism if the student fails to improve as they expect not to improve.  In other words, if the student believes that they “suck at math”, then they do not believe that they will be aided by tutoring, and if that expectation becomes reality, the belief that they “suck at math” serves as a permission to not improve in performance as well as a psychological self-protection mechanism.

When faced with this predicament, as mentioned above, I begin to try to make the student believe that they “do not suck at math”, I do not try to make them believe that they excel at math either, that is yet to be determined and potentially problematic, but definitely I want them to at least be open to the idea that they are on a level playing field as everyone else when it comes to math ability.

I also plant the idea, which is easy to accept, that mathematics is hard as a substitute for some inherent lack of ability. This permits me to set the right expectations that a client might have, by knowing that it is difficult, I will be more easily able to have them commit long enough to try a problem which they might originally have shied away from, and little by little, piece by piece, I am usually able to help them gain confidence in their mathematics ability and hence cause their performance to increase.

I also inform my clients the results of a study performed by Ellis, Fosdick, and Rasmussen (2016) which among a variety of interesting and important conclusions asserts the that girls rated their belief in their abilities in math after a Calculus 1 course less than comparably performing boys in the Calculus 1 class, this was even true for the top performing girls in the class, girls who showed no difference in skill from the top performing boys,  and the authors linked this to their propensity to change majors away from STEM to their corrosive and false belief that they were somehow less skilled than the boys were. They specifically stated that

Our analyses show that, while controlling for academic preparedness, career intentions, and instruction, the odds of a woman being dissuaded from continuing in calculus is 1.5 times greater than that for a man.

 I also recall, and have been able to find another study that was performed, that did the same type of analysis and found a similar kind of result. 

Depending on the client, I often will also recommend the book "A Mind for Numbers" by Barbara Oakley. I recommend this book for two reasons, her inspiring story about her own journey into STEM as well as her explanation of effective study strategies for math and science topics. 

On a broader scale, there are good signs in the world. Among these good signs, there is the huge reduction in the disparity between boys and girls in the top level of math performance(see Ramdani et. al. (2019)). At the same time, there is still a need to increase the visibility of female role models in STEM as related in an article by Kalender et. al. (2019) 

Ultimately, I do have to state that it also bothers me when my male clients say things like "I suck at math" too, but I did not focus on this in this article because it is not the main topic of this article, and because it is unfortunately a refrain I hear most often from my female clients. Many of the same techniques of reinforcement hold. It is also true that I have not discussed the concept of math anxiety, a blanket term that is used to describe a spectrum of psychological impediments to math performance that also need to be acknowledged and dealt with. The handling of mathematical anxiety cannot be dealt with in general in the context of this blog post, as its severity, its nature, and its cause are all different from case to case, and the particular approach that can be taken in one case might be inadequate or inappropriate in another case. 

References

Ellis J, Fosdick BK, Rasmussen C (2016) Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0157447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157447

 Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2019, December 4). Why female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors do not identify with physics: They do not think others see them that way. Physical Review Physics Education Research. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020148

 Ramdani, Y., Rohaeni, O., & Wachidah, L. (2019, November 1). IOPscience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012066

Friday, February 26, 2021

A test post

This is a test post.